Comments on: Avoid anonymous namespace in header files http://www.jeffhung.net/blog/articles/jeffhung/2144/ (My smile insists of having nose. :-) Thu, 03 Nov 2011 00:43:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2-alpha By: fr3@K http://www.jeffhung.net/blog/articles/jeffhung/2144/comment-page-1/#comment-147658 fr3@K Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:27:37 +0000 http://www.jeffhung.net/blog/?p=2144#comment-147658 就我所知唯一一個在 header 用 unnamed namespace 的有效應用是用來 <a href="http://fsfoundry.org/codefreak/2008/12/29/issues-regarding-global-variable-initialization/" rel="nofollow">起始 global object</a>. 就我所知唯一一個在 header 用 unnamed namespace 的有效應用是用來 起始 global object.

]]> By: jeffhung http://www.jeffhung.net/blog/articles/jeffhung/2144/comment-page-1/#comment-147647 jeffhung Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:20:23 +0000 http://www.jeffhung.net/blog/?p=2144#comment-147647 是啊，後來決定不要那麼 paranoid，用 symbol only forward declaration 加 pointer 做掉了。 是啊，後來決定不要那麼 paranoid，用 symbol only forward declaration 加 pointer 做掉了。

]]> By: av http://www.jeffhung.net/blog/articles/jeffhung/2144/comment-page-1/#comment-147645 av Wed, 02 Sep 2009 10:11:48 +0000 http://www.jeffhung.net/blog/?p=2144#comment-147645 所以....還是用 pointer? 我是覺得在 constructor/destructor 處理好即可，除非這個 FooImpl* 會被 delete/new 過，不過你都做成 member obj 了，應該是不會有這問題. 所以....還是用 pointer? 我是覺得在 constructor/destructor 處理好即可，除非這個 FooImpl* 會被 delete/new 過，不過你都做成 member obj 了，應該是不會有這問題.

]]>